Humor

Stu-stu-stumbled upon

I stumbled-upon a blog that stumbled-upon freethoughtpedia’s funny theist quotes.

Some of these were too good not to share:

From years of studying environmentalists I have come to the conclusion that they are both religion based and mentally ill. This makes for a dangerous combination. [...]

The mental illness of environmentalism manifests itself is three forms; Paranoid, Delusional and Criminal insanities. [...]

Since religious environmentalism is a mental disease it must be treated like one. Those afflicted by the malady must be gathered into central locations and be treated by counseling, drug therapy, shock treatments or whatever is necessary to restore their sanity and return them to being productive members of society. The state presently administers such treatments to other mentally ill citizen, even against their will, and therefore there is hope for environmentalists.

Legal methods – Once the sick mind of an environmentalist forces him to cross the line to the realm outside the law they are to be dealt with as any other criminal is. These criminal environmentalists are, in fact, terrorists. They seek to achieve their goals by terrorizing the general population by criminal actions. Like any criminal they have no regard for the rights or lives of their victims. Judges, no matter how liberal, owe it to the general public to protect them from criminal environmentalists by sentencing them as they would any rapist or murderer. They can show no leniency or preference in dealing with them. If their minds can be salvaged through mental treatments they can return to society. If not, then the general public is safer with them incarcerated. The population of a nation is not to be held hostage by the mind of a crazy person.

Mentally ill environmentalists working in the news media are to be treated as any other environmentalist. Counseling, drugs, incarceration, whichever turns them back into normal people.

Environmentalists can be saved from themselves. If we have the courage to act!

I’m not talking about a simple power outage. I’m talking about enriched plutonium which comes from the conversion of uranium into WMD. It is considered the most dangerous substance known to man and absolutely will shut off the electricity present in planes. All any terrorist has to do is drop large quantities of plutonium from airplanes onto American soil and it will render electricity completely useless. And the chain reaction that will occur from the US shutting down will be global. We Americans have had the capacity to do that to our enemies for years. I had erroneoulsy thought that atheists knew that since they claim to know so much about our universe.

[Emphasis added]

But as usual, you haven’t thought things through at all and are speaking from ignorance again.

Carico, CARM [2006-Nov-09]

A few months ago I felt led to put together a “post rapture file” for my unsaved loved ones which is on my computer. My daughter knows that if she doesn’t come to Christ before we go that she is to get this file and share it with everyone. I’m working on a list of names and contact info to put in the file. Anyway, today I just felt very strongly that not only should I remind her of it, but to witness to her for the 1000th time and give her complete instructions on what to do as soon as we are gone. I even went so far as to tell her as soon as we are gone that she is to go to a house that belongs to a friend since he will be gone too. It is WAY off the grid. I’m going to talk to him about it tomorrow and get directions. He loves Tiffany like his own granddaughter so I know it will be fine since all of his loved ones are going too.

I gave her the pin # to my atm and credit cards. I told her to make sure that she plants as big a garden as she can and learn to can food. Not to worry about the kids because they will be with Nana. I’m putting instructions in the file about how to start the generator, where her Daddy’s guns are and how to load them, where the spare car and truck keys are, etc., etc., etc.

BlessHisName, Rapture Ready [2007-Aug-07]

“According to evolutionists, it’s a fact that aliens ruled the planet before the dinosaurs because that can’t be disproven.

We have deformed skulls to prove that these aliens once had ape-like foreheads, and some walked on 2 legs and others walked on 4 legs. And since there have been confirmed sightings of alien spacecraft, that proves that they have come back to check on how things are going on planet earth.

We don’t know who the first alien was, but from the few skulls and bones we have, we can tell that there were millions of them. Then when they had explored planet earth, they found it boring and decided to leave but not before some of them had died here which is why we still have their skulls and bones. From them, we can tell what they wore, what color eyes they had, and that they were covered in hair. These are what evolutionists call facts, so we’ve proven that aliens once ruled the planet earth.”

Carico, CARM [2006-Dec-14]

[Discussing whether to give tracts to children in Halloween, a poster says: "I just think that we need to be respectful of our neighbors, and the parenting decisions that others make.. and I question whether distributing tracts might violate that principal"]

When I see a child, especially children of non christians, I always think of how that child is being brought up not being told about the Lord. We shouldn’t have to wait until that child grows up (IF they live that long) to tell them the Good news. I can understand your point though but the difference is that we KNOW the truth. Other faiths do not.

LivnForChrist, Rapture Ready [2006-Sep-03]

“Sorry but scientists have just shown that mice DNA is more similar to humans than human DNA. So would evolutionists then declare that humans came from mice? Probably. That’s because most people can’t think for themselves and are confused about reality. That’s why they believe anything scientists say.”

Carico, CARM [2007-Jan-09]

If the Bible is wrong when it tells us it is infallible, then it contradicts itself. If it contradicts itself, then it is unreliable. If it is unreliable, then our faith is totally shattered and Christianity is a lie. You need to seriously reconsider your logic.

uscchica09, BibleForums.org [2006-Sep-03]

And my personal fav:

Top Ten Signs you’re a dumbass atheist:

10. You vigorously deny the existence of God, yet you frequently blame him for everything that is wrong in modern society. 9. You repeatedly insist that man did not, in fact, evolve from an ape. Apes and men both evolved from another species who did not resemble Curious George in any way. 8. You criticize Christians who don’t know their Bible, yet you have never opened any of Darwin’s texts. 7. While all created evidence and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all. 6. You can’t seem to understand the fundamental differences between fundamental Muslims and fundamental Christians (hint: strap-on TNT) 5. You willingly attribute all historical atrocities in Europe to a demographic that contained approximately 100% of Europeans during the period in question. 4. You also like to ignore the beneficial discoveries of the aforementioned demographic. 3. You don’t realize that a closed system can be defined however the observer wants, so you throw out technological phrases to try to ignore the implications of thermodynamics. 2. You accuse Christians of being hateful and you hope that they DIAF. 1. Your biggest complaint is that these typically hopeful and caring people want to share the greatest single thing in their life with you. You’re like an idiot who wipes with winning lottery tickets. Clap. Clap.

Clap.

Agent C2H6O, fark [2006-Sep-05]
Dr Samuel C Gipp, Essays and Ideas by Dr Samuel C Gipp, Th.d [2006-Dec-01]

Disclaimer: The views expressed by an individual contributor to this blog are not necessarily shared by all members of FreeThought Fort Wayne. That is what makes this organization so interesting. Commenters on the FreeThought Fort Wayne blog are expected to abide by our comment policy. About the author:  To change this standard text, you have to enter some information about your self in the Dashboard -> Users -> Your Profile box. Read more from this author


  • Share/Bookmark

Discussion

7 comments for “Stu-stu-stumbled upon”

  1. Posted by AnonNo Gravatar | April 3, 2009, 10:04 pm

    I think the “Top Ten Signs you’re a dumbass atheist” is a reaction to Top Ten Signs You’re a Fundamentalist Christian.

    But the poster was correct – those would be signs of a dumbass athiest. Or any kind of dumbass.

  2. Posted by Joel KlinepeterNo Gravatar | April 3, 2009, 11:41 pm

    Anon, some of them are actually spot on as to what we should be saying…

    9 is a valid argument when some idiot claims you think your grandpa was a monkey…

    7 is idiotic because evolution makes no claim to explain the origin of the universe or even the origin of life, only the descent from the earliest life forms to the ones we have today… So what he’s lambasting is actually a valid argument against the supposition that “all created evidence and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth”…

    As far as number 6 the only difference between fundies from the two religions is several hundred years of secularization. Taken literally the bible supports violence almost as much as the koran…

    While the argument that everyone in europe was a christian during the crusades and inquisition is almost true (why have an inquisition if it’s completely true??) The fact remains that these weren’t just the actions of christians but the actions of the recognized church and as such were supposed to be the direct will of god…

    To number 3 anyone who would argue that a ‘closed system’ can be defined any way the observer wants to is an idiot… Pointing out that our solar system is not a closed system is a valid counterpoint to the idiotic claims that thermodynamics makes evolution impossible…

    In number 9 I’m guessing DIAF stands for Die In a Fire??? Only thing i could think of that would get that response from him… I can’t think of any atheists I know who have ever wished for someone to die simply for being a christian… Being a douche possibly, and the two are not mutually exclusive… might be a case of inferring causation from correlation ;)

    My complaint is that these typically “fearful and intolerant” people keep trying to stick their fingers into everyone else’ lives and want to litigate their narrow minded view of morality…

    And I’m assuming that he considers my copious use of the phrase “god damn-it” to be blaming god… Really hard to blame something that doesn’t exist… kinda like telling your mom that your imaginary friend ate all the cookies…

    So yeah, long list of straw-man arguments and claims that falsehood is truth…

  3. Posted by Michael B.No Gravatar | April 4, 2009, 8:19 am

    I wouldn’t classify the top-ten list as coming from a theist. Instead, it came from a sort of subculture that refers (lovingly) to itself as the “a$$hole of the internets.” The datestamp says it came from the forums of weird-news-aggregator fark, which is probably among the tamest and mainstream of the bunch. I would mention the others, but, quite frankly, they scare the crap out of me with what they can do to web pages and personal information. Their sense of humor is abjectly cruel, vicious, nihilistic, and, in my opinion, kind of awesome, because it draws attention to the silliness we (I mean everyone – not just atheists) create when we take ourselves way too seriously.

    This subculture typically has much more disdain for religion than for atheists. However, if an atheist comes off as a little too overbearing or hijacks an unrelated thread, this is the kind of response that ensues. They have a particular dislike for YouTuber “The Amazing Atheist.”

    As Joel pointed out, the arguments contained in the top ten are pretty bogus. However, taking them too seriously is precisely the wrong thing to do.

  4. Posted by Jake DoellingNo Gravatar | April 5, 2009, 9:58 pm

    Ha! I stumbled upon the video based upon the site the blog stumbled upon that I stumbled upon:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9IPoAdct8

  5. Posted by RuthNo Gravatar | April 7, 2009, 2:50 am

    FOR PRETRIB RAPTURE REPEATERS

    Congratulations! You are now fulfilling the Bible which says “Come now, and let us repeat together.”
    Be sure to repeat what Walvoord, Lindsey, LaHaye, Ice etc. repeat what their own teachers repeat what their own teachers repeat etc. etc. etc.!
    Repeat that Christ’s return is imminent because we’re told to “watch” (Matt. 24, 25) for it. So is the “day of God” (II Pet. 3:12) – which you admit is at least 1000 years ahead – also imminent because we’re told to be “looking for” it?
    Also repeat the pretrib myths about the “Jewish wedding stages” and “Jewish feasts” (where’s your “church/Israel dichotomy” now?) even though Christ and Paul knew nothing about a “pretrib stage” and neither did any official theological creed or organized church before 1830!
    You should read “Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty” on the “Powered by Christ Ministries” site to find out why you shouldn’t repeat everything your pretrib teachers repeat.
    Do I have to repeat this?

  6. Posted by Joel KlinepeterNo Gravatar | April 7, 2009, 12:27 pm

    **rolls eyes**

    Enjoy your apocalyptic mythology :p

    Btw, every time you use poor grammar and sentence structure, Jesus cries :p

  7. Posted by Jake DoellingNo Gravatar | April 7, 2009, 4:41 pm

    “Do I have to repeat this?”

    Please, no.

    A psychologist can clear up that bad case of schizophrenia you’ve got going on there.

    Without even researching this unrelated and unintelligent “response”, I’m willing to bet the farm it is a cut and paste job from some nutty site.

Post a comment

FreeThought Fort Wayne Comments Policy
All commenters on the FreeThought Fort Wayne are asked to abide by the following guidelines:

  • No threatening, hostile or abusive personal messages.
  • Opinions, claims, or arguments are subject to debate.
  • Engage in the argument, do not attack the arguer.
  • Comments may be subject to further review.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Related Posts

Our Readers

Locations of visitors to this page