It’s sad to note that yesterday the United Nations voted 23 to 11 with 13 nations abstaining to make defamation of religion a human rights violation. The resolution was championed by the Organization of Islamic Countries wishing to prevent the defamation of Islam, as in the case of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons. Critics, including the World Jewish Congress, see the resolution as an attack on freedom of expresion and philosopher A.C. Grayling has called it the “deification of stupidity.”
I personally can’t help but see this as the U.N. turning a blind eye toward theocratic abuses of human rights. The approval of this resolution comes just over a week after Iranian blogger Omid-Reza Mir-Sayafi took his own life in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison where he was sentenced to a two and a half year sentence for insulting Iranian religious leaders and “posting ’seditious’ materials on his blog.” The problem with the resolution is that in calling criticism of religion or religious leaders a human rights violation it casts tragedies such as Mir-Sayafi’s imprisonment as morally acceptable.
And lest you think that such abuses could never happen here, Oklahoma State Representive Todd Thomsen introduced a bill to the Oklahoma House of Representatives opposing “indoctrination” of University of Oklahoma students to the theory of evolution. The bill also sought to rescind the Department of Zoology’s invitation to have evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, and noted critic of religion, speak at an University sponsored event. While not on the same level as the imprisonment of Mir-Sayafi, this is the same type of theocratic intervention that the U.N. resolution condones. We’re lucky that right now we live in a country with strong protection for freedom of speech and a high wall between church and state but it’s clear that such principles are no longer valued by the United Nations.
Human Rights Council Resolution
A/HRC/10/L.. Combating Defamation of Religions
The Human Rights Council,
Reaffirming the pledge made by all States, under the Charter of the United Nations, to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of all human rights and fundamental freedoms without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
Reaffirming also that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated,
Recalling the 2005 World Summit Outcome adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 60/1 of 24 October 2005, in which the Assembly emphasized the responsibilities of all States, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and acknowledged the importance of respect and understanding for religious and cultural diversity throughout the world,
Recognizing the valuable contribution of all religions to modern civilization and the contribution that dialogue among civilizations can make towards improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all humankind,
Welcoming the resolve expressed in the United Nations Millennium Declaration adopted by the General Assembly on 8 September 20006 to take measures to eliminate the increasing acts of racism and xenophobia in many societies and to promote greater harmony and tolerance in all societies, and looking forward to its effective implementation at all levels,
Underlining in this regard the importance of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action adopted by the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001, welcoming the progress achieved in implementing them, and emphasizing that they constitute a solid foundation for the elimination of all scourges and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,
Welcoming all international and regional initiatives to promote cross-cultural and interfaith harmony, including the Alliance of Civilizations and the International Dialogue on Interfaith Cooperation and their valuable efforts towards the promotion of a culture of peace and dialogue at all levels,
Welcoming further the reports of the Special Rapporteur submitted to the Council at its fourth, sixth and ninth sessions that highlight the serious nature of the defamation of all religions and the need to complement legal strategies;
Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination and acts of violence against followers of certain faiths, occurring in many parts of the world, in addition to the negative projection of certain religions in the media and the introduction and enforcement of laws and administrative measures that specifically discriminate against and target persons with certain ethnic and religious backgrounds, particularly Muslim minorities following the events of 11 September 2001, and that threaten to impede their full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to restriction on the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,
Noting with concern that defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, could lead to social disharmony and violations of human rights, and alarmed at the inaction of some States to combat this burgeoning trend and the resulting discriminatory practices against adherents of certain religions and in this context stressing the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions and incitement to religious hatred in general and against Islam and Muslims in particular,
Convinced that respect for cultural, ethnic, religious and linguistic diversity, as well as dialogue among and within civilizations, is essential for global peace and understanding while manifestations of cultural and ethnic prejudice, religious intolerance and xenophobia generate hatred and violence among peoples and nations,
Underlining the important role of education in the promotion of tolerance, which involves acceptance by the public of and its respect for diversity,
Noting various regional and national initiatives to combat religious and racial intolerance against specific groups and communities and emphasizing, in this context, the need to adopt a comprehensive and non-discriminatory approach to ensure respect for all races and religions,
Recalling its resolution 7/19 of 27 March 2008 and UNGA resolution 63/154 of 18 December 2008,
1. Takes note of the report of the High Commissioner on the compilation of existing legislation and jurisprudence concerning defamation of and contempt of religions and the report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance presented during the 9th session of the Human Rights Council;
2. Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping and defamation of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief, still evident in the world, which have led to intolerance against the followers of these religions;
3. Strongly deplores all acts of psychological and physical violence and assaults, and incitement thereto, against persons on the basis of their religion or belief, and such acts directed against their businesses, properties, cultural centres and places of worship, as well as targeting of holy sites, religious symbols and venerated personalities of all religions;
4. Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances of deliberate stereotyping of religions, their adherents and sacred persons in the media, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups aimed at creating and perpetuating stereotypes about certain religions, in particular when condoned by Governments;
5. Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001; )
6. Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general have, become aggravating factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members of target groups, as well as to their economic and social exclusion;
7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism and in this regard regrets the laws or administrative measures specifically designed to control and monitor Muslim minorities, thereby stigmatizing them and legitimizing the discrimination they experience;
8. Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or related intolerance and discrimination towards any religion, as well as targeting of religious symbols and venerated persons;
9. Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law including articles 19 and 29 of UDHRÂ and 19 and 20 of ICCPR, everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, public health or morals, and general welfare;
10. Reaffirms that General Comment 15 of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, in which the Committee stipulated that the prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred is compatible with freedom of opinion and expression, is equally applicable to the question of incitement to religious hatred;
11. Strongly condemns all manifestations and acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance against national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and migrants and the stereotypes often applied to them, including on the basis of religion or belief, and urges all States to apply and, where required, reinforce existing laws when such xenophobic or intolerant acts, manifestations or expressions occur, in order to deny impunity for those who commit such acts;
12. Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, and to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and beliefs;
13. Underscores the need to combat defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, by strategizing and harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through education and awareness building;
14. Calls upon all States to exert the utmost efforts, in accordance with their national legislation and in conformity with international human rights and humanitarian law, to ensure that religious places, sites, shrines and symbols are fully respected and protected, and to take additional measures in cases where they are vulnerable to desecration or destruction;
15. Calls for strengthening international efforts to foster a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for human rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and urges States, non-governmental organizations, religious leaders as well as the print and electronic media to support and foster such a dialogue;
16. Appreciates the High Commissioner for Human Rights for holding a seminar on freedom of expression and advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence in October 2008, and requests her to continue to build on this initiative, with a view to concretely contributing to the prevention and elimination of all such forms of incitement and the consequences of negative stereotyping of religions or beliefs, and their adherents, on the human rights of those individuals and their communities;
17. Requests the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance to report on all manifestations of defamation of religions, and in particular on the serious implications of Islamophobia, on the enjoyment of all rights by their followers, to the Council during its 12th Session;
18. Requests the High Commissioner for Human Rights to report to the Council at its 12th Session on the implementation of the present resolution, including on the possible correlation between defamation of religions and the upsurge in incitement, intolerance and hatred in many parts of the world.
Date: 3/11/2009

Thank you for this excellent giving us some not-so-excellent news. I guess I’ve always been a little unsure what sort of weight the UN has here in the states. Clearly, Dubya didn’t give them much heed.
So what does this mean for FFW and this blog? Although we are equal opportunity offenders in regards to religion, can we all be put on trial for some human rights violation now? If we try to leave the country, will we be arrested by some Interpol stronghand?
And what about defamation of the lack of religion? Is the humanism and atheism movement going to be “protected” under this edict? I guess the AP says it’s a non-binding resolution, but what the eff does that mean?
These questions are not focused at NeuralGourmet, but rather at the world in general. I think it’s on a lot of our minds.
@Andy W.: In the short run it has no practical implications for us. It’s a non-binding resolution that doesn’t carry the weight of international law which, as you noted, the U.S. violates regularly with impunity. And within the U.S. the Constitution supersedes any U.N. rulings. Probably the worse that could happen is the U.N. passes a resolution calling for a trade embargo on the U.S. for failing to take a stand against “defamation” of religion. Even then I really can’t see many countries refusing to trade with the U.S. because of a few loudmouths.
On a moral level though it is extremely troubling. The resolution was passed by the relatively new, formed in 2006, U.N. Human Rights Council (I should have made clear in my post that this was not a general vote). So we have the U.N. body supposedly tasked with overseeing human rights condoning the abuse of a fundamental human right, the freedom of expression.
Furthermore, it’s a bizarre feat of twisted logic. Human rights are about protecting the rights of individuals. Religions are institutions, not people. Neither are “religious places, sites, shrines and symbols” but according to Reuters, the resolution seeks to ensure those are protected too. Now, while I think the destruction of the Bamyan Buddhas by the Taliban was tragic and a terrible loss of a cultural treasure, in no way or form could I ever construe that solitary act of the destruction of religious symbols to be a human rights violation. And it’s not that hard to find present day actual examples of human rights violations in Afghanistan.
Chilling…simply, horrifyingly chilling. Dark ages, here we come! Thought crimes anyone? Let’s hope this site and it’s commenters are grandfathered when the pitchfork wielders take to the streets. The phrase “speak now or forever hold you peace” has a new meaning. I’ve lost all confidence in the human race.
Thanks for the post. Unfortunately, this is highly disappointing. It’s the ol’ two steps forward, one step back routine. I wish the UN mattered. Such a waste.
In the long run, isn’t the freedom not to have a religion its own human right? I just don’t understand this. I hope that free speech doesn’t get trampled by this inanity.
While I would quibble with some phrases in the Resolution, it is basically saying:
1) Don’t mischaracterize religion.
2) Protect people from violence that results from the mischaracterization.
These seem like perfectly reasonable statements to make.
A prime example of this is illustrated in “A Dream in Doubt“. It’s a story about how the Sikh community in Phoenix, AZ suffered from various forms of violent harrasment after the attacks of 9/11, but focuses on one Sikh man who lost two brothers in two, separate murders.
The definition of defamation is false or misleading claims. As FreeThinkers, we should strive to ensure that the things we say are true. There are enough things wrong with religion that we shouldn’t have to stoop to defaming it in order to win arguments.
And, I think we can all agree that, as a society, we need to protect people from violence even if we disagree with the ideas that those people are advocating.
One problem I have with the resolution is it’s a bit like saying “Let it, hereby, be known that cars in New York city have four wheels.” Well, OK, that’s true. But it doesn’t really state anything of significance. Cars all over the world have four wheels and so do trucks and ATVs.
Re comments by Anon — if that’s all it said it wouldn’t be such an issue. But the real message is an attack on freedom of speech. Read article 9 carefully… For that matter, read the UN Declaration of Human Rights [sic] article 29 that it refers to. Basically, it amounts to “you have freedom of speech to the extent allowed by law”. That may be common practice in many parts of the world, including Europe — but it’s not how we do things in the USA.